basing bones for pathfinder and having issues.
#16
Posted 29 October 2012 - 02:15 PM
#17
Posted 29 October 2012 - 02:30 PM
#18
Posted 29 October 2012 - 03:05 PM
let's face it we are talking about fantasy creature size so accurate isn't a word I wouldn't throw around alot :p I suppose I have just gotten used to Large creatures being LARGE in relation to the pc's.
What? Both the Monster Manual and the Pathfinder Bestiary give height. If you assume the figures are 1/48 to 1/56 scale 2 inches is 8' plus The size of most "large" creatures in D&D. Sorry I came from scale modeling.BTW the Reaper Gnoll shown here is shorter and smaller than my D&D Chainmail Gnolls. He just has a wider stance than them.
Warning: I am a Noob, Follow my advice at your own risk.
#19
Posted 29 October 2012 - 03:07 PM
Oh my god, please, stop saying wide stance. You guys are killing me.
Why? The gnoll's feet are almost 2 shoulder widths wide. It is done to convey a heroic stance. Would you like pictures to illustrate what I'm talking about? He really does have a wide stance/gait/step.
2013 Painting Goal: 36 Figures/ 7 Painted as of 02/27/2013
For other Wargame and miniature related stuff you can read my blog at http://tacticalrock.blogspot.com
Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?
#20
Posted 29 October 2012 - 08:43 PM
Oh my god, please, stop saying wide stance. You guys are killing me.
Why? The gnoll's feet are almost 2 shoulder widths wide. It is done to convey a heroic stance. Would you like pictures to illustrate what I'm talking about? He really does have a wide stance/gait/step.
Because saying someone has a "wide stance" is a way of saying they are gay. Or more specifically, that they are a closeted gay Republican. So when you say that the gnoll has a wide stance it sounds really, really funny.
#21
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:11 PM
Oh my god, please, stop saying wide stance. You guys are killing me.
Why? The gnoll's feet are almost 2 shoulder widths wide. It is done to convey a heroic stance. Would you like pictures to illustrate what I'm talking about? He really does have a wide stance/gait/step.
Because saying someone has a "wide stance" is a way of saying they are gay. Or more specifically, that they are a closeted gay Republican. So when you say that the gnoll has a wide stance it sounds really, really funny.
Learn something new every day heh.
Warning: I am a Noob, Follow my advice at your own risk.
#22
Posted 29 October 2012 - 09:22 PM
In truth, I've learned that my players don't care about the relative sizes of minis when they're enjoined in combat; they just wanna win.
#23
Posted 30 October 2012 - 03:40 AM
I swear we are going to get to a point where we all have to learn a second language because absolutely every word and phrase in English is sexually loaded.
In fact I am going to randomly say to people "You do know that means gay, right?" and see if anyone ever twigs.
Naturally, he died because a wizard exploded.
#24
Posted 30 October 2012 - 07:54 AM
Because saying someone has a "wide stance" is a way of saying they are gay. Or more specifically, that they are a closeted gay Republican. So when you say that the gnoll has a wide stance it sounds really, really funny.
Well in my country, Texas, it doesnt mean that ... ever. As we all know Texas has the only opinion that matters so...
2013 Painting Goal: 36 Figures/ 7 Painted as of 02/27/2013
For other Wargame and miniature related stuff you can read my blog at http://tacticalrock.blogspot.com
Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?
#25
Posted 30 October 2012 - 08:47 PM
Sizing of mins has been a huge issue with the DND Minis line over the years, I say this having been an avid collector and seller of DDM. If you compare the Harbinger Displacer Beast to later iterations it looks like a baby DB. The Troll from that same line is so small in size.
In truth, I've learned that my players don't care about the relative sizes of minis when they're enjoined in combat; they just wanna win.
My players will argue for hours about the scale height of a mins because it may deal with something their characters want to do. Such as " I'll run down that 10' tall passage, if the owlbear follows he will have to suffer from the squeezing rules." When in actuality an owlbear is only about 9' tall, but the DDM owlbear pictured is close to 20' in scale.
Halber
#26
Posted 31 October 2012 - 12:35 AM
Naturally, he died because a wizard exploded.
#27
Posted 31 October 2012 - 08:53 AM
Sizing of mins has been a huge issue with the DND Minis line over the years, I say this having been an avid collector and seller of DDM. If you compare the Harbinger Displacer Beast to later iterations it looks like a baby DB. The Troll from that same line is so small in size.
In truth, I've learned that my players don't care about the relative sizes of minis when they're enjoined in combat; they just wanna win.
My players will argue for hours about the scale height of a mins because it may deal with something their characters want to do. Such as " I'll run down that 10' tall passage, if the owlbear follows he will have to suffer from the squeezing rules." When in actuality an owlbear is only about 9' tall, but the DDM owlbear pictured is close to 20' in scale.
Halber
If you ever have this problem you simply state squeezing rules are based on base size not height.
2013 Painting Goal: 36 Figures/ 7 Painted as of 02/27/2013
For other Wargame and miniature related stuff you can read my blog at http://tacticalrock.blogspot.com
Does anybody else find it odd, by the way, that the information age has led to language becoming an oblique and imprecise tool where even the most straightforward phrasing is pored over with chicken entrails and bone tossing to divine the true meaning?
#28
Posted 31 October 2012 - 09:33 AM
Sacrificing minions: is there any problem it CAN'T solve?
- Lord Xykon, OotS #192
Beowulf ll. 1538-1543
... Pay no heed to proud thoughts, famous champion. Now the flowering of your strength is but for a while. After a while, the time will suddenly come that disease or the sword's edge will cut off your power. Either fire's grasp or flood's surge or blade's bite or spear's flight. Or vicious age, or the flash of your eyes will gutter and burn out! It will be all at once, great campaigner, that death will overpower you.
It's terrifying! Without enough caffeine your body undergoes these hours of partial paralysis and hallucinations! :shudder:
- Argentee
Black Lightning: MA010.
#29
Posted 01 November 2012 - 12:19 PM
I'm now picturing emo owl bears loitering and looking to make fun of the smaller humans...Teenage owl bears emerge from the shadows at the end of the hall you entered...
#30
Posted 01 November 2012 - 03:27 PM
Sizing of mins has been a huge issue with the DND Minis line over the years, I say this having been an avid collector and seller of DDM. If you compare the Harbinger Displacer Beast to later iterations it looks like a baby DB. The Troll from that same line is so small in size.
In truth, I've learned that my players don't care about the relative sizes of minis when they're enjoined in combat; they just wanna win.
My players will argue for hours about the scale height of a mins because it may deal with something their characters want to do. Such as " I'll run down that 10' tall passage, if the owlbear follows he will have to suffer from the squeezing rules." When in actuality an owlbear is only about 9' tall, but the DDM owlbear pictured is close to 20' in scale.
Halber
If you ever have this problem you simply state squeezing rules are based on base size not height.
Well the squeezing rules in the 3.5 DM Guide does have squeezing based on height. Not to mention when you are trying to jump over a monster, then height is very important.
Also I do feel that including the third dimension, which you are already doing when you are using minis, enriches the role playing possibilities. And rather than looking up the height in the MM for every monster, just laying it out on the battlemat to get an idea saves time. It shouldn't be so difficult for a company that makes scale models to make them in scale. Otherwise I would just settle for pogs.
Halber
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: bones, basing, base, pathfinder, 1 inch
Craft Corner →
Show Off →
Bones - Young Dragon & Giant SpiderStarted by Slashhamster , 20 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Craft Corner →
Show Off →
77009 Werewolf Maledrakhs first BoneStarted by Maledrakh , 20 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Craft Corner →
Show Off →
Two more Bones and two favoritesStarted by DocPiske , 19 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Craft Corner →
Show Off →
Two Bones - Dwarf Fighter & Human AlchemistStarted by MamaGeek , 19 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Reaper Discussion →
Reaper General →
The rest of the Runelords?Started by LizardMage , 19 May 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










