Funny that I need to ask but as I got my Bones kobolds, I cant figure out if they are supposed to be the old-school dog-like kobolds or the more recent lizard-like kobolds? They dont seem to have any fur sculpted on them, but the heads/faces look more dog-like then lizard-like...
Thoughts?
Reaper Kobolds, draconic or canine?
Started by
Ulgurstasta
, May 18 2012 07:35 AM
5 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:35 AM
#2
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:10 AM
That's the brilliance of these sculpts. It all depends on how you paint them. They work as either type. I painted mine as more old school canine. That's the way we play them in our DnD games. But I have seen them painted as the lizard type and look great that way too.
#3
Posted 18 May 2012 - 09:28 AM
Ohhh I like that idea. Anything that gives some interesting new options rocks.
#4
Posted 18 May 2012 - 01:12 PM
Depends on how you paint them!
bryan@reapermini.com This post is 100% organic. No Artifical Spellcheck or Grammar Check was used in the manufacturing of this post. No Zombies were harmed in the making of this post.
#5
Posted 19 May 2012 - 02:26 PM
Interesting, I'm not entirely convinced but I will try painting them green and see how it goes
#6
Posted 25 May 2012 - 03:14 PM
Actually, old-school AD&D kobolds had dog-like faces with scaly, reptilian skin. Earlier iterations of D&D (original little brown books, or Holmes basic set) didn't provide any description or illustration and there have never been any furry kobolds in D&D, so the Reaper kobolds are as old-school as you can get.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










