Jump to content


Photo

Ritterlich


  • Please log in to reply
113 replies to this topic

#91 Stubbdog

Stubbdog

    Obssessive Over-Analyzer

  • Bones Supporter
  • 6962 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:56 PM

I have spent somuch time lately in trying to make Army Builder work, that I really havent spent a bunch of time looking at he models themselves, since the projected errata release came out. I know that some of that errata can have a dramatic affect on what I think they need. As I am close to getting the AB to a point where I can start thinking in those terms, I wil try to give you an answer s.......

#92 Chrome

Chrome

    The way is forward.

  • Members
  • 3601 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:46 PM

There are holes left after a Panther/Rhino combo? :huh:
-Chrome

#93 Stubbdog

Stubbdog

    Obssessive Over-Analyzer

  • Bones Supporter
  • 6962 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:50 PM

Well, youdid just mention one thing Chrome...

The Panther used to have a TC4, but then they changed it cause they said it was too powerful. Which was acceptible until they turned around and gave Adon the Recluse. So, I guess I am expecting the Panther to get changed back sometime s....?

#94 Chrome

Chrome

    The way is forward.

  • Members
  • 3601 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 03:06 PM

Well, youdid just mention one thing Chrome...

The Panther used to have a TC4, but then they changed it cause they said it was too powerful. Which was acceptible until they turned around and gave Adon the Recluse. So, I guess I am expecting the Panther to get changed back sometime s....?

No.
-Chrome

#95 Mchandler

Mchandler

    Enlightened

  • Black Lightning
  • PipPipPip
  • 387 posts

Posted 29 January 2008 - 03:57 PM

in my experience ANY recon CAV, vehicle etc with est/ecm combo near a rhino is serious toast <_<

oh you have a rhino.... eep

you have a panther near rhino.... hmmmm CRATER SPECIAL COMING UP!!!!

btdt have a case of t-shirts to prove it,
Hello My Name is Michael and I am a CAV Addict

Mansfield Bears Terraforming Division: Building a better world so you can destroy it

rank: LLGFC ( Lower Level Gopher First Class)

#96 outek

outek

    Enlightened

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 444 posts

Posted 31 January 2008 - 07:13 PM

I just posted a (my) kitbashed version for the Rudegern in the WIP thread for those who may be interested (and I don't even play Ritterlich... yet). Enjoy.
Mansfield Bears Terraforming Division: Building a better world so you can destroy it.

#97 Mchandler

Mchandler

    Enlightened

  • Black Lightning
  • PipPipPip
  • 387 posts

Posted 01 February 2008 - 08:29 AM

ohhhhhhh its nice..... :devil:
Hello My Name is Michael and I am a CAV Addict

Mansfield Bears Terraforming Division: Building a better world so you can destroy it

rank: LLGFC ( Lower Level Gopher First Class)

#98 outek

outek

    Enlightened

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 444 posts

Posted 09 February 2008 - 09:45 PM

For those interested, I have just posted my kitbashed version of the Armadillo in the WIP thread.
Mansfield Bears Terraforming Division: Building a better world so you can destroy it.

#99 Forlorn Hope

Forlorn Hope

    Instigator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 203 posts

Posted 14 April 2008 - 07:29 PM

Hey everyone, my plans to start an Adon army have been put on hold as it turns out that I already have a Ritt army under the new rules. This is good news, though, because the Ritterlich was a close second and I am happy to collect Ritt models.

OK - I found the kitbashes Outek did for the Armadillo and the Rudegern (great job, BTW), but the main concern is something to use for Eagles, as they seem like they can bring much pain. I was wondering what people have used to Proxy for this, and whether or not the Fenri is too different of a model type to double.
The Forlorn Hope Private Military Contractors. D Company, the "Dirty Clubs," specializing in Arctic Terrain.
"Making the assault so that you don't have to since 2272."

Click here to see the Dirty Clubs in action

#100 Chrome

Chrome

    The way is forward.

  • Members
  • 3601 posts

Posted 14 April 2008 - 10:10 PM

The Eagle is a licensed version of the Kikyu, so Kikyu models would fit in perfectly. After the first Galaxy War, Mitso-Ta licensed the designs for both the Kikyu and Tsuiseki to almost every UCOR in the galaxy. When NTG was formed they aquired the rights through some legal wrangling and quickly began work on their own modified design.
-Chrome

#101 Forlorn Hope

Forlorn Hope

    Instigator

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 203 posts

Posted 15 April 2008 - 11:49 AM

The Eagle is a licensed version of the Kikyu, so Kikyu models would fit in perfectly. After the first Galaxy War, Mitso-Ta licensed the designs for both the Kikyu and Tsuiseki to almost every UCOR in the galaxy. When NTG was formed they aquired the rights through some legal wrangling and quickly began work on their own modified design.


Groovy, thanks. Is this is the color text somewhere so that I can read a little more about it? Don't worry about exact page number, just where I could go to find info like this?
The Forlorn Hope Private Military Contractors. D Company, the "Dirty Clubs," specializing in Arctic Terrain.
"Making the assault so that you don't have to since 2272."

Click here to see the Dirty Clubs in action

#102 Chrome

Chrome

    The way is forward.

  • Members
  • 3601 posts

Posted 15 April 2008 - 02:05 PM

No, that's super-duper brand new fluff straight from my head to you. Actually it came from a conversation between Pat and myself about the mini. When you see the Eagle miniature, you'll understand. :poke:
-Chrome

#103 Sergeant_Crunch

Sergeant_Crunch

    God of Overly Complex Tactics and Tactical Errors

  • Members
  • 8028 posts

Posted 15 April 2008 - 02:55 PM

Wasn't the 3D model for the Eagle posted in the Mil Net forums some time back?

I'm not so sure I'd want to get hit by a missile with a "dog brain" AI.
My blog:  http://scsminimadness.blogspot.com/


#104 Chrome

Chrome

    The way is forward.

  • Members
  • 3601 posts

Posted 15 April 2008 - 03:08 PM

It might have been. I just did a quick search and didn't turn anything up tho.
-Chrome

#105 Sergeant_Crunch

Sergeant_Crunch

    God of Overly Complex Tactics and Tactical Errors

  • Members
  • 8028 posts

Posted 15 April 2008 - 04:10 PM

This is the thread I was thinking of, but it wasn't in there.

I'm not so sure I'd want to get hit by a missile with a "dog brain" AI.
My blog:  http://scsminimadness.blogspot.com/





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users